<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Are we in better nick for Stoke away?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/01/16/are-we-in-better-nick-for-stoke-away/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/01/16/are-we-in-better-nick-for-stoke-away/</link>
	<description>The talk in Block 5...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bendtnersbettercousin		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/01/16/are-we-in-better-nick-for-stoke-away/#comment-2833</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bendtnersbettercousin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 12:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/?p=10338#comment-2833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/01/16/are-we-in-better-nick-for-stoke-away/#comment-2832&quot;&gt;foreverinourshadow&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m reserving judgement until after these games. Seven points from these three games would be a great return. But we have to beat Stoke and Chelski to do it. That will be a tall order.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/01/16/are-we-in-better-nick-for-stoke-away/#comment-2832">foreverinourshadow</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m reserving judgement until after these games. Seven points from these three games would be a great return. But we have to beat Stoke and Chelski to do it. That will be a tall order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foreverinourshadow		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/01/16/are-we-in-better-nick-for-stoke-away/#comment-2832</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foreverinourshadow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/?p=10338#comment-2832</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[problem is our away form has been poor, Stoke will use their size to unsettle us, it&#039;s worked in the past before and it will work again, the trouble is Wenger doesn&#039;t know how to deal with it, so I can see us dropping points today, our defence shambles against Liverpool was a joke, like City we will have to rely on our home form to sustain our lead, but I can&#039;t see us winning the league, unless Wenger buys, but we know he won&#039;t. our best chance for years to win it and he will find a way to blow, I know it, we all know it as we have seen it time and time again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>problem is our away form has been poor, Stoke will use their size to unsettle us, it&#8217;s worked in the past before and it will work again, the trouble is Wenger doesn&#8217;t know how to deal with it, so I can see us dropping points today, our defence shambles against Liverpool was a joke, like City we will have to rely on our home form to sustain our lead, but I can&#8217;t see us winning the league, unless Wenger buys, but we know he won&#8217;t. our best chance for years to win it and he will find a way to blow, I know it, we all know it as we have seen it time and time again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
