<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Is Giroud good enough for you?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/</link>
	<description>The talk in Block 5...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 19:11:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bendtnersbettercousin		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3251</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bendtnersbettercousin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3243&quot;&gt;Mark&lt;/a&gt;.

Perhaps it&#039;s because I do see the value he adds. You&#039;d be hard pressed to argue he doesn&#039;t add any value. But ultimately he is a striker and they are more often than not judged on goals. I&#039;m not making excuses for him, indeed, I even suggest that perhaps we should change our attacking model.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3243">Mark</a>.</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s because I do see the value he adds. You&#8217;d be hard pressed to argue he doesn&#8217;t add any value. But ultimately he is a striker and they are more often than not judged on goals. I&#8217;m not making excuses for him, indeed, I even suggest that perhaps we should change our attacking model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bendtnersbettercousin		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3250</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bendtnersbettercousin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3242&quot;&gt;Fred Caffaso&lt;/a&gt;.

But Giroud assisted Theo at the weekend?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3242">Fred Caffaso</a>.</p>
<p>But Giroud assisted Theo at the weekend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3249</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Simon, I think the problem is that Wenger has gone so much into a mindset of protecting players he has lost his ruthlessness. Its understandable when you don&#039;t have the pressure to succeed that he did when he had to answer to Dein, Fiszman etc. I think its more important to Wenger to protect Giroud than benchmark him properly with his contemporaries.  Wenger has made bids in the past for Higuain, Suarez and Benzema. So obviously he isn&#039;t sold on Giroud. If Wenger had pressure from Dein for his job, I am sure he would have taken the risk on one of those three and we would walking the title.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon, I think the problem is that Wenger has gone so much into a mindset of protecting players he has lost his ruthlessness. Its understandable when you don&#8217;t have the pressure to succeed that he did when he had to answer to Dein, Fiszman etc. I think its more important to Wenger to protect Giroud than benchmark him properly with his contemporaries.  Wenger has made bids in the past for Higuain, Suarez and Benzema. So obviously he isn&#8217;t sold on Giroud. If Wenger had pressure from Dein for his job, I am sure he would have taken the risk on one of those three and we would walking the title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Indemix		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3248</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Indemix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3232&quot;&gt;atomicgeneral&lt;/a&gt;.

Think ManU would&#039;ve sold you Hernandez so soon after getting bashed for letting you take Welbeck? Why do you think Debuchy&#039;s claimed blocked loan wish happened if true?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3232">atomicgeneral</a>.</p>
<p>Think ManU would&#8217;ve sold you Hernandez so soon after getting bashed for letting you take Welbeck? Why do you think Debuchy&#8217;s claimed blocked loan wish happened if true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Simon		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3245</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mark, I agree we ought to go large but Wenger has shown he won&#039;t unless it really in his opinion works. I think to give him credit it&#039;s because of the opportunity cost of not having that money to sign perfect players in other parts of the team. All supposition I admit: Wish I was a fly on the wall on in transfer meetings!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I agree we ought to go large but Wenger has shown he won&#8217;t unless it really in his opinion works. I think to give him credit it&#8217;s because of the opportunity cost of not having that money to sign perfect players in other parts of the team. All supposition I admit: Wish I was a fly on the wall on in transfer meetings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3244</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3244</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3240&quot;&gt;Bendtnersbettercousin&lt;/a&gt;.

Also don&#039;t understand the point about value. How much extra do we earn from sponsorships if we challenge for the title instead of just hanging around? Premiership clubs earn £100m for being relegated from TV money alone. £50m? £60m? Not much when you look at earnings.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3240">Bendtnersbettercousin</a>.</p>
<p>Also don&#8217;t understand the point about value. How much extra do we earn from sponsorships if we challenge for the title instead of just hanging around? Premiership clubs earn £100m for being relegated from TV money alone. £50m? £60m? Not much when you look at earnings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3243</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3236&quot;&gt;anthony walters&lt;/a&gt;.

Don&#039;t understand this argument. The striker&#039;s responsibility is to score. Contributions from wide positions or deeper midfield is welcomed but that is not their job. Their job is to create for the striker to score. And they do create. We are always top or near the top for chances created. Giroud does not score enough. Its been 4 years now and we don&#039;t have striker who has scored more than 20 premier league goals. The watermark for title winning sides. We have gone backwards since RVP left. How long do you want make excuses for Giroud?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3236">anthony walters</a>.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t understand this argument. The striker&#8217;s responsibility is to score. Contributions from wide positions or deeper midfield is welcomed but that is not their job. Their job is to create for the striker to score. And they do create. We are always top or near the top for chances created. Giroud does not score enough. Its been 4 years now and we don&#8217;t have striker who has scored more than 20 premier league goals. The watermark for title winning sides. We have gone backwards since RVP left. How long do you want make excuses for Giroud?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fred Caffaso		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3242</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Caffaso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Walters I don,t Know which matches or Giroud you talking about when you point out that he hold up play. As far as am concerned the guy can,t do a thing like that. Giroud cannot control the ball dribble  and give a pass pt tor an assist. Walter kindly acknowledge the fact that Giroud score that No of goals only because of the kind of players around him. Ever seen what Lukaku does at everton]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walters I don,t Know which matches or Giroud you talking about when you point out that he hold up play. As far as am concerned the guy can,t do a thing like that. Giroud cannot control the ball dribble  and give a pass pt tor an assist. Walter kindly acknowledge the fact that Giroud score that No of goals only because of the kind of players around him. Ever seen what Lukaku does at everton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bendtnersbettercousin		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3240</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bendtnersbettercousin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3239&quot;&gt;Simon&lt;/a&gt;.

Not for less than a kings ransom - re: Mahrez]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3239">Simon</a>.</p>
<p>Not for less than a kings ransom &#8211; re: Mahrez</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Simon		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3239</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3238&quot;&gt;Bendtnersbettercousin&lt;/a&gt;.

Agreed no value, worried we cant find value in a market with so few &#039;sure things&#039;. Aubameyang would be choice for striker - but who doesn&#039;t want Aubameyang? (Barcelona can safely pass...) 

I&#039;d take Mahrez all day long:  Aside from his pass completion he&#039;s perfect: goals, assists, pace, trickery and good defensively. There are very few players that stand out on the right that fit our needs. I wonder though if we can get him when they will have Champions League football?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3238">Bendtnersbettercousin</a>.</p>
<p>Agreed no value, worried we cant find value in a market with so few &#8216;sure things&#8217;. Aubameyang would be choice for striker &#8211; but who doesn&#8217;t want Aubameyang? (Barcelona can safely pass&#8230;) </p>
<p>I&#8217;d take Mahrez all day long:  Aside from his pass completion he&#8217;s perfect: goals, assists, pace, trickery and good defensively. There are very few players that stand out on the right that fit our needs. I wonder though if we can get him when they will have Champions League football?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bendtnersbettercousin		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3238</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bendtnersbettercousin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3238</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3237&quot;&gt;Simon&lt;/a&gt;.

I think he wanted someone in the summer but couldn&#039;t get what he wanted for the price he wanted. Hey, you only have to look at Benteke for £32million to see that sometimes there&#039;s no value. But I think you might be right. He&#039;s steadily improved and so the need hasn&#039;t felt as pressing for Arsène. Agree on the right hand side, especially as nobody has nailed that spot, but there&#039;s rumblings of Mahrez in the summer. That&#039;d be interesting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3237">Simon</a>.</p>
<p>I think he wanted someone in the summer but couldn&#8217;t get what he wanted for the price he wanted. Hey, you only have to look at Benteke for £32million to see that sometimes there&#8217;s no value. But I think you might be right. He&#8217;s steadily improved and so the need hasn&#8217;t felt as pressing for Arsène. Agree on the right hand side, especially as nobody has nailed that spot, but there&#8217;s rumblings of Mahrez in the summer. That&#8217;d be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Simon		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3237</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3237</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think Wenger is making do with Giroud as a hangover from the days when we didnt have money and he would be more comfortable with a more mobile more clinical striker that contributed less to the team. One has not been available for money we have been prepared to spend yet and Giroud has steadily improved. Should that chnage Giroud will be on the bench: the best back-up striker in the league. 

I think we have more of a problem on the right which despite all our potential we seem to have no one who can own the position. I think there may have been some truth in the Isco rumours.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Wenger is making do with Giroud as a hangover from the days when we didnt have money and he would be more comfortable with a more mobile more clinical striker that contributed less to the team. One has not been available for money we have been prepared to spend yet and Giroud has steadily improved. Should that chnage Giroud will be on the bench: the best back-up striker in the league. </p>
<p>I think we have more of a problem on the right which despite all our potential we seem to have no one who can own the position. I think there may have been some truth in the Isco rumours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: anthony walters		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3236</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anthony walters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3236</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i see your point good arguement.i do think we could do slightly better but like many people i think you overvalue a prolific striker in a title team .most teams have 3 or 4 players around the double figure mark.we haven&#039;t scored enough goals around the team .

giroud has done his bit so far has been great the last 2 matches laying on 2 goals ,winning headers and hold up play.with welbeck back it does give us the chance to use his pace and hold up front at times when we need it.
basically we need sanchez,ramsey,welbeck and walcott to get more goals.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i see your point good arguement.i do think we could do slightly better but like many people i think you overvalue a prolific striker in a title team .most teams have 3 or 4 players around the double figure mark.we haven&#8217;t scored enough goals around the team .</p>
<p>giroud has done his bit so far has been great the last 2 matches laying on 2 goals ,winning headers and hold up play.with welbeck back it does give us the chance to use his pace and hold up front at times when we need it.<br />
basically we need sanchez,ramsey,welbeck and walcott to get more goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bendtnersbettercousin		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3235</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bendtnersbettercousin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3233&quot;&gt;Mark&lt;/a&gt;.

Very good point - especially when you consider the legacy left by so many Arsenal strikers over the last 30 years. Thanks for the comment Mark,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3233">Mark</a>.</p>
<p>Very good point &#8211; especially when you consider the legacy left by so many Arsenal strikers over the last 30 years. Thanks for the comment Mark,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bendtnersbettercousin		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3234</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bendtnersbettercousin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3234</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3232&quot;&gt;atomicgeneral&lt;/a&gt;.

That&#039;s the key question, isn&#039;t it? Is that what we need? I used to think not, but am not so sure any more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3232">atomicgeneral</a>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the key question, isn&#8217;t it? Is that what we need? I used to think not, but am not so sure any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3233</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Giroud has never fitted our style. How many times has he broken the back line? How many times has taken a ball over the top. All things that RVP, Henry, even Adebayor, Wright, Kevin Campbell could do. You have to go back to 1991 when Alan Smith won us the title to find a target man winning the league. Giroud style comes from an age that is gone. The long ball era. Which makes it even more astonishing that Wenger bought him. We cannot play counter attack with Giroud. All title winning teams need that ability. Giroud is a target man who will always give 10-15 premier league goals. I am sorry but thats not enough for title winner in any league. And I wish that apologists would see that its more important to support a club than any one player.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giroud has never fitted our style. How many times has he broken the back line? How many times has taken a ball over the top. All things that RVP, Henry, even Adebayor, Wright, Kevin Campbell could do. You have to go back to 1991 when Alan Smith won us the title to find a target man winning the league. Giroud style comes from an age that is gone. The long ball era. Which makes it even more astonishing that Wenger bought him. We cannot play counter attack with Giroud. All title winning teams need that ability. Giroud is a target man who will always give 10-15 premier league goals. I am sorry but thats not enough for title winner in any league. And I wish that apologists would see that its more important to support a club than any one player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: atomicgeneral		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3232</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[atomicgeneral]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2016/02/17/is-giroud-good-enough-for-you/#comment-3232</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[we shouldve gotten javier hernandez. affordable and a fox.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we shouldve gotten javier hernandez. affordable and a fox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
