<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Gazidis: the Samir Nasri CEO	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2018/09/18/gazidis-the-samir-nasri-ceo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2018/09/18/gazidis-the-samir-nasri-ceo/</link>
	<description>The talk in Block 5...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 08:48:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: a		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2018/09/18/gazidis-the-samir-nasri-ceo/#comment-19669</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 08:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2018/09/18/gazidis-the-samir-nasri-ceo/#comment-19669</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[he has indeed made the board richer but that came at the expense of the club. mustafi was his signing and when he was questioned why arsenal don&#039;t spend more on players his answer was &quot; we spent 30 million on mustafi&quot; that statement showed how far he was from actual reality of the cost of good players and that 30 million was a large figure 5 years prior . he may have put some infrastructure in but he also appeased sven&#039;s move for mkitaryean and objected wengers preference for martial. as bad as sanchez has been , mkitaryean  has been damn awful also.

the sad part of his move is - the board expected wenger to compete when they had better resources but we were so far behind Chelsea, city and United it needed a large cash injection not just adding players like ozil and sanchez. 

gazidis couldnt get Stan kroenke to do that . he made moves for wenger to be removed but the whole board and gazidis owe wenger - if it wasn&#039;t for the top four finishes and agreeing to sell the likes of fabregas, rvp , nasri etc along side- arsenal would have been in a far worse situation . funny when most of the players left they didn&#039;t have anything bad to say about wenger but the board and that they had no ambition

I should be happy he is leaving an  but he is going to join a team who I have also supported - Milan.  he hasn&#039;t got the capability to make Milan into the team they once were. they are so far behind juventus, if he is there to make the board money then he can possibly do that but will need a good manager to assure champions league finishes and to sell best players]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he has indeed made the board richer but that came at the expense of the club. mustafi was his signing and when he was questioned why arsenal don&#8217;t spend more on players his answer was &#8221; we spent 30 million on mustafi&#8221; that statement showed how far he was from actual reality of the cost of good players and that 30 million was a large figure 5 years prior . he may have put some infrastructure in but he also appeased sven&#8217;s move for mkitaryean and objected wengers preference for martial. as bad as sanchez has been , mkitaryean  has been damn awful also.</p>
<p>the sad part of his move is &#8211; the board expected wenger to compete when they had better resources but we were so far behind Chelsea, city and United it needed a large cash injection not just adding players like ozil and sanchez. </p>
<p>gazidis couldnt get Stan kroenke to do that . he made moves for wenger to be removed but the whole board and gazidis owe wenger &#8211; if it wasn&#8217;t for the top four finishes and agreeing to sell the likes of fabregas, rvp , nasri etc along side- arsenal would have been in a far worse situation . funny when most of the players left they didn&#8217;t have anything bad to say about wenger but the board and that they had no ambition</p>
<p>I should be happy he is leaving an  but he is going to join a team who I have also supported &#8211; Milan.  he hasn&#8217;t got the capability to make Milan into the team they once were. they are so far behind juventus, if he is there to make the board money then he can possibly do that but will need a good manager to assure champions league finishes and to sell best players</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2018/09/18/gazidis-the-samir-nasri-ceo/#comment-19668</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 07:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbangooners.com/2018/09/18/gazidis-the-samir-nasri-ceo/#comment-19668</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You fail to mention the consequences of Wenger cleverly cultivating Kroenke - who knows nothing about football and everything about return on investment.  Wenger was an ace politician who grew to control everything right down to appointing a new tea lady. Arsene likes it this way, Arsene likes it that way. Meanwhile the weak UK Board took several years to lose their adoration for Wenger after his 1st decade of success. In the end it was the fans who broke Wenger&#039;s grip. When Gazidis eventually had room to manoeuvre he DID make the changes most of us had known were so essential. Prior to that I have little doubt that Wenger would be on trans Atlantic phone calls to Silent Stan.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You fail to mention the consequences of Wenger cleverly cultivating Kroenke &#8211; who knows nothing about football and everything about return on investment.  Wenger was an ace politician who grew to control everything right down to appointing a new tea lady. Arsene likes it this way, Arsene likes it that way. Meanwhile the weak UK Board took several years to lose their adoration for Wenger after his 1st decade of success. In the end it was the fans who broke Wenger&#8217;s grip. When Gazidis eventually had room to manoeuvre he DID make the changes most of us had known were so essential. Prior to that I have little doubt that Wenger would be on trans Atlantic phone calls to Silent Stan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
