<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Fans bled of more money for the broadcasters again	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2020/10/12/fans-bled-of-football-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2020/10/12/fans-bled-of-football-money/</link>
	<description>The talk in Block 5...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:29:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: roz1967		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2020/10/12/fans-bled-of-football-money/#comment-27043</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[roz1967]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.suburbangooners.com/?p=14986#comment-27043</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Do lots of other supporters have the same opinion as you, or are they happen to pay?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do lots of other supporters have the same opinion as you, or are they happen to pay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2020/10/12/fans-bled-of-football-money/#comment-27042</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.suburbangooners.com/?p=14986#comment-27042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Worth noting that the line is that Sky/BT are only getting costs (what that means in practice, who knows?). Apparently the PL insisted that the PPV price had to be higher than the EFL (£10) as it’s a superior product. But it’s poor logic for the reasons you give. The optimal price is almost certainly less than £15.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worth noting that the line is that Sky/BT are only getting costs (what that means in practice, who knows?). Apparently the PL insisted that the PPV price had to be higher than the EFL (£10) as it’s a superior product. But it’s poor logic for the reasons you give. The optimal price is almost certainly less than £15.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
