<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Show me the Vini money	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.suburbangooners.com/2026/08/04/show-me-the-vini-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2026/08/04/show-me-the-vini-money/</link>
	<description>The talk in Block 5...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: daveg		</title>
		<link>https://www.suburbangooners.com/2026/08/04/show-me-the-vini-money/#comment-28400</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daveg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.suburbangooners.com/?p=19929#comment-28400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have kept the dated post of over 5 weeks ago, when I was the first to post the news of Arsenals interest in Vinicius, when he refused Madrid&#039;s offer and the meeting of Arsenals representative meeting Vinicius agent, it was then mentioned that Arsenal would be able to afford his wages by offering him a huge signing on fee instead of increasing his wages, which would then balance out to what he was demanding.

This meeting and planned finance for his wages was with the understanding that his valuation was just £77m due to his final 1 year term of his contract left before Madrid would loose him for free.

Since, 5 weeks ago that I reported the £77m valuation figure, it had remained at that for a good few weeks, but since the media has only just woke up over the past two weeks to the possibility of Arsenal being interested in Vinicius, the media has once again speculated that Arsenal are willing to pay £120m for him, which is wrong and way off the £77m valuation that I mentioned over 5 weeks ago.

The media also suggested that Arsenal was prepared to pay £110m for Rogers, which we also all now know was way off the true £80m that Arsenal always valued Rogers at, but funny enough, the highjacking Chelsea believed the over speculating medias ridiculous valuation, and in doing so, Chelsea ridiculously went in with an even higher offer than what the media was suggesting, and over spent by at least £30m, when Villa would have eventually accepted a lot less. 

Chelsea believed the medias overvaluation as usual and ended up with egg on their face with their once again highjacking and overspending as they did before when they highjacked Mudryk and look how that turned out!

The &quot;jealous&quot; Arsenal Hating media will always overvalue any potential deal that Arsenal are interested in, as most of them live in hope that Arsenal will waste their transfer budget on fewer quality players and would even try to fob Arsenal off with their being better alternative players that are just mediocre. Arsenal unlike Chelsea are too savvy with their valuations and take no notice of media overvaluations or mediocre player advice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have kept the dated post of over 5 weeks ago, when I was the first to post the news of Arsenals interest in Vinicius, when he refused Madrid&#8217;s offer and the meeting of Arsenals representative meeting Vinicius agent, it was then mentioned that Arsenal would be able to afford his wages by offering him a huge signing on fee instead of increasing his wages, which would then balance out to what he was demanding.</p>
<p>This meeting and planned finance for his wages was with the understanding that his valuation was just £77m due to his final 1 year term of his contract left before Madrid would loose him for free.</p>
<p>Since, 5 weeks ago that I reported the £77m valuation figure, it had remained at that for a good few weeks, but since the media has only just woke up over the past two weeks to the possibility of Arsenal being interested in Vinicius, the media has once again speculated that Arsenal are willing to pay £120m for him, which is wrong and way off the £77m valuation that I mentioned over 5 weeks ago.</p>
<p>The media also suggested that Arsenal was prepared to pay £110m for Rogers, which we also all now know was way off the true £80m that Arsenal always valued Rogers at, but funny enough, the highjacking Chelsea believed the over speculating medias ridiculous valuation, and in doing so, Chelsea ridiculously went in with an even higher offer than what the media was suggesting, and over spent by at least £30m, when Villa would have eventually accepted a lot less. </p>
<p>Chelsea believed the medias overvaluation as usual and ended up with egg on their face with their once again highjacking and overspending as they did before when they highjacked Mudryk and look how that turned out!</p>
<p>The &#8220;jealous&#8221; Arsenal Hating media will always overvalue any potential deal that Arsenal are interested in, as most of them live in hope that Arsenal will waste their transfer budget on fewer quality players and would even try to fob Arsenal off with their being better alternative players that are just mediocre. Arsenal unlike Chelsea are too savvy with their valuations and take no notice of media overvaluations or mediocre player advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
